[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: "Nick Fleming" <Nick@bigfatpanda.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <patents@aful.org>
Subject: [Patents] Greg: Why information is physical
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 12:16:39 +0100

----- Original Message -----
From: "Xavi Drudis Ferran" <xdrudis@tinet.org>

> I haven't understood a single bit.

You're not the only one.

In simple terms I think the whole document is nonsense,
Total and utter gibberish.

Regards.

Nick.

Re: [Patents] Greg: Why information is physical, Xavi Drudis Ferran
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Patents] Greg: Why information is physical, Nick Fleming
- Re: [Patents] Greg: Why information is physical, Seth Johnson

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)