[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
To: PILCH Hartmut <phm@a2e.de>
Cc: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] Greg: Why information is physical
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 08:33:33 -0400
Organization: Real Measures

One really, *really* good thing about this is actually
acknowledges the question of whether information is
physical. Greg always just kept saying "software is
technology" before. The issue of the status of pure
information is now being expressed from proponents of the
other side.

It's actually an *enormous* step forward.

Seth Johnson

--

[CC] Counter-copyright:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cc/cc.html

Re: [Patents] Greg: Why information is physical, Xavi Drudis Ferran
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Patents] Greg: Why information is physical, Nick Fleming
- Re: [Patents] Greg: Why information is physical, Seth Johnson

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)