Re: US patent reform strategy inaugurated by myths & lies

[Andrey Khavryuchenko <akhavr@kds.com.ua>]

Gregory,

"GA" == Gregory Aharonian wrote:

 GA> But me, I'm greedy, and if I develop something new in software, I want
 GA> to make sure I get a good chunk of the profits.  For a small entity
 GA> such as myself, knowing the games of intellectual property, there is
 GA> nothing better than a patent.  

So, what are you going to patent?  What in your software you'd like to
monopolize to rip profits from?

 GA> Sure, the quality of patents has to be improved, but that is important
 GA> only if you are serious about IP protection and running businesses.

The 'IP' letters are meaningless.  So-called 'IP' lacks natural qualities,
that make the essence of 'property' (like land).  The word of ideas is much
different from the word of things.  'IP' tries to apply the 'ownership'
concept of things to ideas.  For explanation, why it fails, you may read,
for example, Plato.

All exclusive rights monopolies are established and protected with brute
force methods.

-- 
Andrey V Khavryuchenko          http://www.kds.com.ua/
Offshore Software Development