[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'phm@a2e.de' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

> Getting back to your question, Congress recently passed a new law
> dealing with insurance terrorism (in light of 9/11).  During those
> discussions, one Senator tried (unsuccessfully, thankfully) to inject
> some religion into patent policy by offering an amendment to prohibit
> the PTO from issuing patents on cloning humans.

What is "insurance terrorism" ?
How did senator Throwback construct the connection to humangenetic
patents ?

> Out of curiousity, are the same games played when new laws are considered
> by the European Parliament?

People try to use law projects to create or expand institutions which they
can control.





(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)