[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Xavier Drudis Ferran <xdrudis@tinet.org>
- To: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
- Cc: C-FIT_Community@RealMeasures.dyndns.org, C-FIT_Release_Community@RealMeasures.dyndns.org, fairuse-discuss@mrbrklyn.com, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Judge Dubious About BT Link Patent
- Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 09:13:41 +0200
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 06:52:41PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
>
> (Forwarded from CYBERIA list)
>
> > http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,50356,00.html
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 16:36:45 -0400
> From: Randall <rvh40@INSIGHTBB.COM>
>
> Judge Dubious About Link Patent
>
> By Michelle Delio
>
>
> This seemingly random finding might create a loophole that
> would allow BT to enforce its patent now. Typically, patents
> and copyrights must be consistently and constantly defended
> by their holders in order to be considered valid.
>
I thought only trademarks had to be defended. Patents are
often enforced after years of oblivion
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)