[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: PILCH Hartmut <phm@a2e.de>
- To: Xavier Drudis Ferran <xdrudis@tinet.org>
- Cc: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>, <C-FIT_Community@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>, <C-FIT_Release_Community@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>, <fairuse-discuss@mrbrklyn.com>, <patents@aful.org>
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Judge Dubious About BT Link Patent
- Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 09:34:06 +0200 (CEST)
> > This seemingly random finding might create a loophole that
> > would allow BT to enforce its patent now. Typically, patents
> > and copyrights must be consistently and constantly defended
> > by their holders in order to be considered valid.
>
> I thought only trademarks had to be defended. Patents are
> often enforced after years of oblivion
I think this article writer is on the whole quite clueless. I wouldn't
believe anything of what he writes.
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)