[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: PILCH Hartmut <phm@a2e.de>
To: <patents@aful.org>
Subject: IETF to accept patent-encumbered standards
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 19:29:17 +0200 (CEST)

The discussion within standardisation bodies on whether or not to go on
with standardisation in areas which are covered by dense patent thickets
has entered a new round.  It looks rather sad:

  Intellectual Property Rights (ipr) Charter
  http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ipr-charter.html

See also

  RFC 2026: Internet Standards Process and IPR
  http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2026.txt

--
Hartmut Pilch, FFII & Eurolinux Alliance              tel. +49-89-12789608
Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation       http://swpat.ffii.org/
120,000 signatures against software patents      http://www.noepatents.org/

IETF to accept patent-encumbered standards, PILCH Hartmut
- Slashdot questions, Nick Fleming
  - Re: [Patents] Slashdot questions, Bouthier Christophe
    - Re: [Patents] Slashdot questions. Cancelled, Xavi Drudis Ferran

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)