[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Edward Welbourne <eddy@chaos.org.uk>
- To: phm@a2e.de
- Cc: srctran@world.std.com, Alexandre.Dulaunoy@ael.be, C-FIT_Community@realmeasures.dyndns.org, dmca_discuss@lists.microshaft.org, free-sklyarov-uk@xenoclast.org, patents@aful.org, iriXx@irixx.org, ilya@theIlya.com
- Subject: Re: [Free-sklyarov-uk] Re: [DMCA_Discuss] Re: [Patents] IT World Feature: Patently ridiculous: What's Europe to do?
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 01:01:44 +0000
> why should company A spend such monies if company B can wait until
> company A has spent such monies, learn from what company A did without
> having to spend the money, and then start selling the product as well,
> often at a cheaper price than company A because company B doesn't have
> to spend the initial monies?
a good question: but, sadly, not at all addressed by the modern reality
of patents, in which company B has but to threaten company A with its
arsenal of patents covering parts of what A has done; A is then forced
to allow B to undercut, unless A can afford to write off the monies
spent on a product it, post hoc, discovers itself unable to exploit.
Worse yet, company C can wade in, with a pure-IP business plan, and
demand money off both A and B, without having to embark on any of the
scary economic risks associated with actually trying to deliver
something useful to the public in a market without any assurance of
reward for honest labours, as A have by now discovered.
Eddy.
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)