[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: "Sylvain Perchaud" <sylvain@europe-shareware.org>
- To: "Gregory Aharonian" <srctran@world.std.com>, <epo@mlist.austria.eu.net>
- Cc: Brevets <patents@aful.org>
- Subject: Re: Economic engineering as a patentable technology
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 10:45:36 +0200
- Organization: Europe Shareware
Le jeudi 5 septembre 2002, à 3:12, Gregory Aharonian a écrit:
>As a conceptual antidote, what follows is a recent article in the New
>York Times by a professor of economics and of information sciences at
>the University of California at Berkeley, Hal Varian, who makes a nice
>argument on economics as a science and economy engineering (which
>includes business methods) as an applied science (and therefore a
>technology).
[cut]
>So why shouldn't such a successful design be eligble for a patent?
simply ask the article's author, Hal Varian, and you'll get a negative answer.
Hal Varian, along with Carl Shapiro and other Berkeley economists, is
well known for being against software and business methods patents.
Please ask the economists before posting such messages.
--
Sylvain Perchaud
http://www.europe-shareware.org
- Re: Economic engineering as a patentable technology, Sylvain Perchaud
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)