[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Bouthier Christophe <Christophe.Bouthier@loria.fr>
- To: patents@aful.org
- Subject: News rules at the US Patent Office
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:52:36 +0200
Hello.
Have you seen this article ?
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/23/technology/23PATE.html
(needs free registration).
It is about the new plans that the US Patent Office want to apply :
- Sliding scale of fees for applications with more than 20 claims
"The more you want to claim, the more you have to pay"
- outsourcing research of prior art to private agencies
(Sounds like the dream job of Greg, isn't it :-))
- electroninc patent filling.
With all the patents about anything concerning exchanging document
trhough electrical means, I wonder how many patents they will have to
licenses to get this working :-)
The first idea seems great. Of course it do not tackle the problem of
logical patenting. But still, at least the patent will be less
overbroad. What do you think ?
C.
--
By the grace of God Almighty
And the pressures of the marketplace
The human race has civilized itself.
It's a miracle. -Roger Waters-Amused to death-
- News rules at the US Patent Office, Bouthier Christophe
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)