[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Peter Vandenabeele <peter.vandenabeele@mind.be>
- To: Xavi Drudis Ferran <xdrudis@tinet.org>
- Cc: Peter Vandenabeele <peter.vandenabeele@mind.be>, Alexandre Dulaunoy <alexandre.dulaunoy@ael.be>, riel@nl.linux.org, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] pooling patents for progress and protection
- Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 10:11:45 +0100
- Organisation: Mind NV -- http://mind.be/ -- Leuven/Belgium
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:51:15PM +0100, Xavi Drudis Ferran wrote:
> El Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 12:22:27AM +0100, Peter Vandenabeele deia:
[...]
> > What do you see as a negative side-effect if some would continue to
> > explore the idea in parallel (potential defocus from the urgent action on
> > the European level is one of course) ?
>
> Defocus is a big one, and another one is your are selling thin air (if at
> all possible
> your plan is not yet proven, and could give false hope to politicians and
> developers alike).
OK. I take this. I will first focus the little time I can spend on it to look
into the European case and let my views on patent pooling at rest for a while.
> > Thanks for your detailed answer,
> >
> Is not as detailed as you deserve. Sorry about that.
Thanks again. The arguments are instructive to develop a better argumentation
to defnd our joined interests in this.
Peter
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)