[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>
- To: riel@nl.linux.org
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] pooling patents, version 2
- Date: 03 Jan 2003 11:33:50 +0100
- Organization: Xsec s.r.l.
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 11:25, riel@nl.linux.org wrote:
> Agreed, IP is a wrong term. However, I haven't found an alternative
> wording yet; maybe it is time we came up with an alternative word
> that covers patents, copyright and the whole field covered by IP,
> but that doesn't leave the false suggestion of ownership.
As my culture derive from the one that foolow "authorship rights"
approach instead of the "copyright" I coined the following term on an
italian discussion mailing list:
"Intellectual Paternity"
many disagreed on the term, as it fail to tell you about the possibility
to trade, but that's on purpose, ideas can have a father not an owner as
they are immaterial.
Simo.
> > Now what I really think is that your idea is wrong for few reasons:
> >
> > 1. by accepting to play the game you admit you failed and you accept the
> > swpat idea.
>
> You can't win if you don't play. In Europe there is still a chance
> to save the economy from software patents, but in the USA and Japan
> there really is no other choice but to play. The global market
> means that even European companies will have to play, because some
> of their (potential) clients are in the USA and/or Japan.
>
> Btw, note that "playing the game" doesn't necessarily mean agreeing
> with the other players. Just look at the position of the GPL in the
> copyright game.
>
> > 2. as the current proposal, you fail the most important thing: defend
> > free software as I will explain:
>
> I'm still waiting for your proposal on how to do things better.
>
> Your criticism would have been helpful if I had a solution for
> the points you've come up with, but as it is now I don't have
> a solution yet. Even random braindumps that point in the general
> direction of a solution are welcome, since they might inspire
> somebody into finding a solution.
>
> kind regards,
>
> Rik
--
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce@xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)