[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: "Brenno J.S.A.A.F. de Winter" <brenno@dewinter.com>
- To: Bernard Lang <Bernard.Lang@inria.fr>
- Cc: patents <patents@liberte.aful.org>
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Wired News: Judge Dubious About Link Patent
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:15:06 +0100
- Organization: De Winter Information Solutions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yeah. I just wonder. Wouldn't American law provide with a counter
law-suit as soon as the case on the alleged patent infringement was
lost. Surely there must be some way to strike back ... I would suggest
that if you increase the risk of a counter claim that can cost you
dearly you would think twice before claiming intellectual property on
prior art...
Bernard Lang wrote:
|
|
| tehy seem to be the vicitms in that one
|
|
| what a world
|
| bernard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE+LTnK3GS+v2n8CeMRAmYFAJ9K5alLu/73GPBtMZOm3fMEZ/EMZwCeL/Fo
LHrE5bUbkiVZGIbyJWXxRY0=
=oVJ2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)