[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: PILCH Hartmut <phm@a2e.de>
To: news@ffii.org
Cc: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: EPO/McCarthy logic
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 22:10:03 +0100 (CET)

> The logic (or lack thereof) in McCarthy's new proposal is now to some
> degree analyzed at
>
>         http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/amccarthy0302/

The analysis is there now.  It wasn't this morning, due to an old
misplaced symbolic link.  Sorry.

Re: EPO/McCarthy logic, PILCH Hartmut
- Re: EPO/McCarthy logic, PILCH Hartmut

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)