X-Sympa-To: patents
Return-Path: <critto@wp.pl>
Delivered-To: patents@aful.org
Received: from smtp.wp.pl (smtp.wp.pl [212.77.101.161])
	by stabilite.aful.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D0041972
	for <patents@aful.org>; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 15:29:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (WP-SMTPD 19651 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2003 13:25:32 -0000
Received: from qb25.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (HELO krzy) ([80.50.62.25])
          (envelope-sender <critto@wp.pl>)
          by smtp.wp.pl (wp-smtpd) with SMTP
          for <patents@aful.org>; 20 Apr 2003 13:25:32 -0000
From: critto@wp.pl
To: patents@aful.org
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 15:50:40 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: [Patents] JURI amendments for 22/4 now up (in Italian)
X-AntiVirus: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A.
X-WP-ChangeAV: 0
Priority: normal
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304191602160.13145-100000@querty.oas.a2e.de>
In-reply-to: <1050767831.2714.107.camel@localhost>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b)
Message-Id: <20030420132934.93D0041972@stabilite.aful.org>
X-Validation-by: critto@wp.pl

Subject:        	Re: [Patents] JURI amendments for 22/4 now up (in Italian)
From:           	Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>
To:             	Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
Copies to:      	patents@aful.org
Organization:   	Xsec s.r.l.
Date sent:      	19 Apr 2003 17:57:11 +0200

> I think it has become a common tactic to over-extremize positions to
> make things seem more neutral and so have them passed as compromise
> position.

Perversion, perversion and some more perversion :-/
What disgusting, bastardly, deceitful practices! To cheat the public, to 
delude the interested opposing parties and the people as whole, 
to extinguish the vigilance. And, the 'spinning tactic' - to allow the 
opposition to taste in victory, and then, when the people are 
unconscious of what's happening, 'to  wind the line back'.

It doesn't have anything to do with democracy. It's a swindle.
Such methods should be treated as a crime of treason (and fraud) 
against public (and public interest) and punishable with long prison 
sentences. 

Are we going to publicize it? I mean: the 'legislative' tactics of  
those persons along with their names, countries and positions they 
take. To make it more readable for everyone? I think we should. 
The voters of Europe should know their 'representatives'. I hope that 
the majority of MEPs and EC isn't consisted of such types.

Yours,
Krzysztof (Christopher) "Critto" Sobolewski
critto@wp.pl http://www.libertaryzm.prv.pl

