[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>
- To: Gregory Aharonian <srctran@world.std.com>
- Cc: João Miguel Neves <joao@silvaneves.org>, Carsten Svaneborg <svanebor@mpip-mainz.mpg.de>, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] EU Commission: Competitive and efficient European enterprises
- Date: 09 Apr 2003 19:12:28 +0200
- Organization: Xsec s.r.l.
On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 18:08, Gregory Aharonian wrote:
> > 3) Why do we want more software patents? To pay lawyers?
> > 5) Why are we going to reduce user-end and incremental innovation?
> > 6) Why can't 2 persons have the same idea (the basis for patents)?
>
> Interesting questions. But they apply to all fields of technology, not
> just software. Once again, such questions illustrate why software is
> just the next field of engineering to be subject to the patent system.
The answers to this question may do, not the questions itself.
But seem you are so willing to push the patent system as you are not
willing to produce evidence of the claimed benefits of such patent
system would have. You are not credible this way.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce@xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Patents] EU Commission: Competitive and efficient European enterprises, (continued)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)