[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: <xdrudis@tinet.org>
- To: Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>
- Cc: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>, critto@wp.pl, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] why EU junk legislation survives
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:41:56 +0200 (CEST)
Please note again that I'm misinformed, but I thought the vagueness
in the directive left room for member states legislators to implement
more concrete laws, which do not contradict the directive but maybe
avoid its worst interpretations. If so, then the worst cases should
be avoided in those member states, since the state law will be applied
in judgements, not the directive directly. There's where I thought the
fight was.
Xavi Drudis Ferran
xdrudis@tinet.org
- Re: [Patents] why EU junk legislation survives, xdrudis
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)