Re: [Patents] why EU junk legislation survives

[Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>]

There were space mitigate the most crude aspects of EUCD, here in Italy
nobody (in the parliament) cared however, even if we made a good effort
to analyze and criticize the EUCD directive and make people aware of
where were the problems here:
http://www.softwarelibero.it/progetti/eucd/

Also here in Italy the directive has not been discussed in the
parliament but delegated to the government that analyzed it in separate
specialized commissions and then approved it.

On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 11:37, xdrudis@tinet.org wrote:
> Please note again that I'm misinformed, but I thought the vagueness
> in the directive left room for member states legislators to implement
> more concrete laws, which do not contradict the directive but maybe
> avoid its worst interpretations. If so, then the worst cases should 
> be avoided in those member states, since the state law will be applied
> in judgements, not the directive directly. There's where I thought the
> fight was.
> 
> 
> 
> Xavi Drudis Ferran
xdrudis@tinet.org
-- 
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce@xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part