[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Erik Josefsson <erikjosefsson@telia.com>
- To: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] JURI amendments for 22/4 now up (in Italian)
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:46:09 +0200
On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 23:41:46 +0100
James Heald <j.heald@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> On the other hand Elly Plooij (ELDR, NL) seemed to do a very good job
> in steering the ITRE discussions, so don't be too quick to write off
> all the liberals.
Yes, some of it is very good, but I was really confused (and still is)
from the first sentence in her report:
"Patent and copyright protection are complementary and may overlap."
http://www.europarl.eu.int/meetdocs/committees/juri/20030428/490455en.pdf
To me this is exactly the problem that should be solved.
If I write a computer program, I would like to know for sure that nobody
else may have a valid overlapping patent.
//Erik
- Re: [Patents] JURI amendments for 22/4 now up (in Italian), (continued)
Re: [Patents] JURI amendments for 22/4 now up (in Italian),
Hartmut Pilch
RE: [Patents] JURI amendments for 22/4 now up (in Italian),
Simon Duke
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)