[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
To: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [fsl-discuss] Re: [Patents] The politics of software over-protection -- moving forward..
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 23:38:14 +0200 (CEST)

GregBot iterated

> >So So, Mr Aharonian, please give us an answer how protecting an idea,
> >expressable in logics, by purchased monopoly, can enhance the technical
> >development!
>
> Protecting software ideas with patents enhances software technical
> development the same way protecting electronic ideas with patents
> enhances electronic technical development, the same way protecting
> optical ideas with paents enhances optical technical development,
> the same way protecting biotech ideas with patents enhances biotech
> technical development, etc. In each case, the expressed logic being
> protected is the patent claims.

... and still didn't answer the question how swpat can promote progress.

Except for an unreasoned "one size fits all" belief statement, I find
nothing in here.

Re: [fsl-discuss] Re: [Patents] The politics of software over-protection -- moving forward.., (continued)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)