[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>
- To: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] GregNews: A history of artistic innovation as artistic invention
- Date: 29 Apr 2003 01:48:44 +0200
- Organization: Xsec s.r.l.
On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 20:46, Hartmut Pilch wrote:
> >From Greg's PatNews:
>
> !20030427 A history of artistic innovation as artistic invention
>
> As part of my new Web site on the global patenting of entertainment
> and art, I have prepared a lengthy (if not the longest) global chronology
> of artistic inventions over the last 4000 years. I argue that innovation
> is invention, and when properly described, patentable. The chronology is
> available at:
>
> www.patenting-art.com/history/histor-e.htm
The list is freighting at best ...
> ---------------------------
>
> Indeed an informative list which again shows that the distinction
> "functional vs esthetic", which seems to be what current EPO software
> patent evangelists like Dai Rees mean by "technical vs untechnical", is
> also fragile and can be withered away any time if there is a strong
> commercial interest in broad monopolies on what Art 52 EPC calls
> "esthetic creations".
well, I think it is clear to everybody, proswpat people look at their
own private interests and not at the consequences of their proposal on
the society and macro-economy.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce@xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)