[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
To: mag <mag@bunuel.tii.matav.hu>
Cc: Patent forum <patents@aful.org>
Subject: Re: [Patents] Amendment 50
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 11:52:10 +0200 (CEST)

> I am reading the text of the amendments to the directive proposal.
> Amendment 50 does not affect the English version. Why?
> What does it affect?

I'd suspect that it affects only certain bad wordings in other language
versions.

There have been some strange disparities, such as one language saying

"fields of technology"

and another

"computer-implemented inventions as a field of technology"

in a title of an article.

But I haven't checked whether amendment 50 is such a case.

Amendment 50, mag
- Re: [Patents] Amendment 50, Hartmut Pilch

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)