[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Roland Orre <orre@nada.kth.se>
- To: Gregory Aharonian <srctran@world.std.com>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Russell's contempt for the motivation of scientists and engineers
- Date: 07 May 2003 07:53:18 +0200
- Organization: Royal Institute of Technology
On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 22:38, Gregory Aharonian wrote:
> <snip> ... circuit diagrams we write are not simply a set of
> functionality ...
> </snip>
When you give examples like this, is this to try to apply
"patentability" onto creations were copyrights or other types of
protections are the proper choice?
I can't see how an ordinary circuit diagram can be patentable. This
is usually what is called an "industrial design" and is also protected
as such, but patentable? no!
You seem not to believe in copyrights and similar, do you?
Why is patentability so important for you?
Roland Orre
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)