[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: James Heald <j.heald@ucl.ac.uk>
To: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] CULT, ITRE, JURI, ...
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 15:48:57 +0100

Sorry, an extra 'then' got into my email,

> There is then

[shouldn't have been there]

> a short time when further amendments can be proposed,
> for the full Parliament to consider. Such amendments may only be
> tabled by "the committee responsible [ie JURI], a political group or
> at least thirty-two Members". (Rule 139)

To clarify: the deadline for parliamentary amendments is some time after
JURI has finalised its report (? 22nd May), but before the final
parliamentary vote (? 18th June).

CULT, ITRE, JURI, ..., taavid
- Re: [Patents] CULT, ITRE, JURI, ..., James Heald
  - Re: [Patents] CULT, ITRE, JURI, ..., James Heald

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)