[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Guillaume Ponce <contact@guillaumeponce.org>
To: Roland Orre <orre@nada.kth.se>
Cc: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] EPO and swpatents
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 11:49:23 +0200 (CEST)

> What is the real motivation that EPO has illegally been providing
> software patents despite its rule about software as such not being
> patentable?

> ...

> EPO should also be a public service organ and should as such also
> follow the law.

I was not aware that the EPO was actually breaking the law. So I have
one more question: Cannot - and should not - the EPO be sued for
disrespecting the law?

If it is possible, who could sue the EPO?

-- Guillaume Ponce
http://www.guillaumeponce.org/

progress bar stickers... a problem?, Rui Miguel Seabra
- EPO and swpatents, Roland Orre
  - Re: [Patents] EPO and swpatents, Ward Vandewege
  - Re: [Patents] EPO and swpatents, Guillaume Ponce
    - Re: [Patents] EPO and swpatents, Hartmut Pilch

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)