[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'taavid@luunja.edu.ee' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
> patenting.  This coincided with a campaign, begun in 1997 by EPO &
> friends, to change the law, both at the EPC and EU level.

And they could not change the law in 2000. Then they wanted to change only 
EPC?? Has any polticians/institutions changed their opinions since that?

> Very few: only those which somehow wrongly slipped into our database.

But why only few (hundreds? thousands?)?? If programs/algorithms were 
patentable? 



(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)