[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Xavi Drudis Ferran <xdrudis@tinet.org>
- To: critto@wp.pl
- Cc: Xavi Drudis Ferran <xdrudis@tinet.org>, Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] patents in europe...
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 22:11:07 +0200
El Sun, May 18, 2003 at 09:50:07PM +0200, critto@wp.pl deia:
>
> Uh. That explains nothing, because in the previous sw pat case (yr
> 2000), many MEPs were in strong opposition; they knew what's
> actually happening. I hope that this case the plenary vote will sink
This is news. I didn't know (or don't remember) that
the European Parliament (MEP = Member of the European Parliament)
was at all involved in the EPC reform in 2000. I thought the
EPC is not part of the EU and therefore at most MPs from contracting
states would be aware, not MEPs.
>
> But those 'radical crazy people' could be good at converting the
> voters against her; those 'r.c.p' could be good at sniffing a patent
> swindle, and pursuing it in the course of a legal action (is any
> planned ???) But OK, maybe ya're a better lobbyist than me, so I
> give up :) to your methods ...
>
I have nothing against explaining the problems of software patents,
the proposals about to be voted, the meaninglessness of the proposed
limits, etc. to the general public. I think you can't have too much
publicity of it (done properly, of course, no spam, etc.).
>
> I'd love to contact her with a letter; if you have any pattern of such a
> text, please feel free to forward it, and I will send it (but I must
> know her address; I don't care that it's not 'my mep', I may contact
> all of them, regardless of a country)
www.eurolinux.org , as Hartmut said.
--
Xavi Drudis Ferran
xdrudis@tinet.org
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)