X-Sympa-To: patents
Return-Path: <mva@df.lth.se>
Delivered-To: patents@aful.org
Received: from igloo.df.lth.se (igloo.df.lth.se [194.47.250.47])
	by stabilite.aful.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FD943E02
	for <patents@aful.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:48:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (mva@localhost)
	by igloo.df.lth.se (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h5IKfph23893;
	Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:41:51 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:41:51 +0200 (MEST)
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin_Wahl=E9n?= <mva@df.lth.se>
To: Patrizio Menchetti <patrizio.menchetti@menchlaw.com>
Cc: Rui Miguel Seabra <rms@1407.org>, <intprop-l@topica.com>,
	<patents@aful.org>
Subject: Re: [Patents] Re: more misinformation from McCarthy
In-Reply-To: <3EF0E539.28505.24BAC2D@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0306182234520.21652-100000@igloo.df.lth.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Validation-by: mva@df.lth.se



On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Patrizio Menchetti wrote:

> On 18 Jun 2003 at 21:03, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
>
> Ahh, so smarty ... :) Maybe you want to have a look at my previous
> posts, especially that one with the little "dualistic" word - and maybe
> study a little law if you want to play the lawyer (at least in the real
> world, where people pay you)

Most of the people on the patents (at) aful.org list are not lawyers (I am
a computer scientist) and would probably rather not be involved in this
process at all. Many of us were happy with the interpretation of Art 52-57
EPC made by our national courts.

Cheers, Martin





