X-Sympa-To: patents
Return-Path: <ehj@cleosan.com>
Delivered-To: patents@aful.org
Received: from cleosan.com (unknown [194.198.15.242])
	by stabilite.aful.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD08143DCB
	for <patents@aful.org>; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:35:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from h251n2fls33o988.telia.com ([213.67.225.251] helo=localhost)
	by cleosan.com with asmtp (Exim 4.04)
	id 19UNdp-0007VG-00
	for patents@aful.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:29:37 +0200
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:29:33 +0200
From: Erik Josefsson <ehj@cleosan.com>
To: patents@aful.org
Subject: snip of second McCarthy contrib.
Message-Id: <20030623112933.7bf6c120.ehj@cleosan.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Validation-by: ehj@cleosan.com

Last minute of section contributon of McCarthy from clip:

http://www.digitalforbruger.dk/SWPAT/JURI-20030616/1055842429316196789/cinema_player?servinfoid=1055836727447856832

start at 07:35 to the end of the clip.

So I hope members, and I find those members that support my approach, and I hope that members, well, at the end of the day, feel that we have actually made progress in this area, and that we have attemted to set some limits in perhaps a moderately restrictive way, without entierly reinventing patent law, which I would hasten to add, we are not in ability to do that, we are legislators to create framework and laws for interpretation by experts, but we are not experts ourselves.

//Erik

