[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Rui Miguel Seabra <rms@1407.org>
- To: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Technical contribution
- Date: 02 Jun 2003 16:55:47 +0000
- Organization: 1407 Org
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 19:01, halber@idea.net.pl wrote:
> How do you assess:
>
> An invention consisting of a mixture of technical and non-technical
> features and having technical character as a whole is to be assessed with
> respect to the requirement of inventive step by taking into account of all
> those features which contribute to said technical character whereas
> features making no such contribution cannot support the presence of
> inventive step.
>
> This is headnote from decision T 641/00 Boards of Appeal the EPO.
As usual, what is technical?
A program [ on disk ], characterised that upon loading into memory
[ something eminently technical ] happens.
Would seem to pass as an invention according to that paragraph...
Rui
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Patents] Technical contribution, Rui Miguel Seabra
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)