[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- To: Jeff Veit - Tanasity <patents@tanasity.com>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Patents meeting in Cambridge last week - follow up
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 06:54:29 +0200 (CEST)
> Still much of this is under the assumption that
>
> 1. We somehow can't get around software patents
> 2. There is a lot of good will out there for reforming the patent
> system
>
> I think these two assumptions contradict each other.
>
> If there was good will for all the small reform measures which you are
> proposing, then there would also be good will for considering to adopt
> a strict approach such as that in the early days of the European Patent
> Office, which you find exemplified at
>
> http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/epo-t850022/
To say it better: many of the reform measures which the participants of
your meeting proposed are much more far-reaching and difficult to
implement than a decision to return to the standards of EPO T22/85, i.e. a
correct interpretation of the current law.
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)