[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
To: xdrudis@tinet.org
Cc: j.heald@ucl.ac.uk, <patents@aful.org>
Subject: Re: [Patents] Good letter from Andrew Duff MEP (ELDR)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:35:33 +0200 (CEST)

> Btw, anybody knows what study does he refer when he says?:
>
> The Research
> Directorate of the European Parliament also produced a study that is
> critical of the attempt to construct a regime that does not explicitly limit
> the extent of patentability.

Surely Bakels & Hugenholtz

http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/dgiv0206/

DG IV = Research Directorate.

Re: [Patents] Good letter from Andrew Duff MEP (ELDR), xdrudis
- Re: [Patents] Good letter from Andrew Duff MEP (ELDR), Hartmut Pilch
- Re: [Patents] Good letter from Andrew Duff MEP (ELDR), James Heald

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)