[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: <ehj@cleosan.com>
To: <bernhard.kaindl@gmx.de>
Cc: <patents@aful.org>
Subject: Re: [Patents] Initial notes on Mon 16th JURI meeting
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:16:49 +0200 (CEST)
Importance: Normal

> 1st speech - Marlene McCarhy

yes

> 2nd speech (nur sure, the native language sounded like spanish)

It was Berenguer. He defended his own amendement 56.

> I think the 3rd speech was then:
>
> - Mr. Harbor

yes

> - Mr. Rothlay:

yes

> - Madame Gorou danach

yes, could be Garreau, dont know spelling

> - Mr. Berenguer

yes

> - Mr. Rothley

yes

> - Fr. Nebler Stimme:

yes

> - Hr. Howard

Yes Anthony Howard from CEC. Very complex.

I think chairman Gargani said something here, defending his amendement(s).

> - McCarhty

yes

> - The President:

yes

JURI vote tomorrow for sure,

Plenary vote very probably in september.

//Erik

Initial notes on Mon 16th JURI meeting, Bernhard Kaindl
- Re: [Patents] Initial notes on Mon 16th JURI meeting, ehj
- Re: [Patents] Initial notes on Mon 16th JURI meeting, Hartmut Pilch

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)