[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- To: news@ffii.org, <patents@aful.org>
- Subject: McCarthy wins in JURI
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:04:55 +0200 (CEST)
The JURI vote was delayed by 2 hours. Our little conference was thereby
made impossible. Around 13.00 the voting was pushed through in 20
minutes, and McCarthy won a majority on all points, which means
- introduction of program claims
- refusal of interoperability privilege (ITRE 15)
- refusal of definition of "technical"
- what is new needn't be technical and what is technical needn't be new
- no need for a technical solution, only problem must be technical
- additional rationales for patentability (e.g. need to make money
from licensing in view of low-cost economies)
etc.
McCarthy was subsequently surrounded by congratulating journalists and
explained them that she only wanted to harmonise the status quo, wasn't
legalising software patents, was against US-style patenting of algorithms
and business methods, would not hurt opensource software etc. Some of
these journalists also had a chance to meet Erik and Alex who watched the
session.
A collection of statements and documentation about the JURI vote is found
at
http://swpat.ffii.org/news/03/juri0617/
--
Hartmut Pilch, FFII & Eurolinux Alliance tel. +49-89-18979927
Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
145,000 votes 400 firms against software patents http://noepatents.org/
- McCarthy wins in JURI, Hartmut Pilch
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)