[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'svanebor@mpip-mainz.mpg.de' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

On Tuesday 17 June 2003 17:57, you wrote:
>>> Software is just one of the branches of physics.
>> Why do you claim that?
> Read physics journals for the answer.

I have access to the Max Planck society's online journals, and
the Polymer institutes paper journals (my workplace), i.e. hundreds
of physics journals, could you possible illucidate which ones I
should read to find support for your claim?

-- 
  Mvh. Carsten Svaneborg




(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)