[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>
- To: Patrizio Menchetti <patrizio.menchetti@menchlaw.com>
- Cc: intprop-l@topica.com, xdrudis@tinet.org, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Re: more misinformation from McCarthy
- Date: 19 Jun 2003 00:47:57 +0200
- Organization: Xsec s.r.l.
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 21:35, Patrizio Menchetti wrote:
> On 18 Jun 2003 at 20:44, Hartmut Pilch wrote:
>
> > If the inter-state approach wasn't good enough and supreme caselaw
> > authority was needed, the EU could simply regulate that Art 52-57 EPC
> > are EU law and put the ECJ in charge, couldn't it?
>
> I am afraid this is precisely what's not possible under EU law without
> enacting a
> Directive. And what you describe is precisley what the Directive aims to
> do, isnt'it?
Absolutely not, it is what is claimed to do in words, but not in
reality.
If you would care to carefully read the proposal, you'll find that
software as such will be patentable, while the current European Patent
Convention clearly say they are not.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce@xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)