[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'Matthias.Hannich@tcpa-info.org' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

Seth Johnson wrote:
Please advise.

Is this correct?

I know I saw something on this list to the effect that they've moved forward
from a previous date of September.

Take a look at what Hartmut Pilch said in "[Patents] Europarl to press ahead quickly with swpat decision, thanks to PSE".

Hartmut Pilch wrote:
> According to
>
> http://wwwdb.europarl.eu.int/oeil/oeil_ViewDNL.ProcedureView?lang=2&procid=5974
>
> the plenary debate and with it probably the vote in the European
> Parliament about the proposed software patentability directive as amended
> by JURI
>
>    http://swpat.ffii.org/news/03/juri0617/
>
> will take place in 10 days
>
> Until yesterday the parliament's presidents had scheduled this for
> beginning of september.





(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)