[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
To: Andreas Franke <afranke@ags.uni-sb.de>
Cc: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: Recital 7 a missing on FFII page
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:54:49 +0200 (CEST)

> In the latest report, there is Amendment 3:
>
> =======================
> Recital 7 a (new)
> (7a) The aim of this Directive is not to amend the
> European Patent Convention, but to prevent different
> interpretations of its provisions.
>
> Justification:
> The European Patent Convention is an international
> instrument which can be amended only by the
> mechanisms provided for in the convention itself.
> =======================

Indeed AMcCarthy played a trick here. She inserted a justification which
is not that of Berenguer, the proponent, and which makes the recital
meaningless.

Re: Recital 7 a missing on FFII page, Hartmut Pilch

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)