[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>
- To: Jozef Halbersztadt <halber@idea.net.pl>
- Cc: Xavi Drudis Ferran <xdrudis@tinet.org>, PILCH Hartmut <phm@a2e.de>, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] "condition of ..." amendment
- Date: 27 Jun 2003 14:53:34 +0200
- Organization: Xsec s.r.l.
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 14:09, Jozef Halbersztadt wrote:
> There is no simple answer whether washing machine, screen and processor
> each of them is not
>
> new, not innovative, together are inventive. But only if their assembly
> is inventive than
>
> software (GUI) can be a part of the invention.
Shouldn't this case (washing machine) fall under the obviousness clause?
Such washing machine seem to be the obvious outcome to an engineer.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce@xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)