[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: "Alec Clelland" <alec@clelland.net>
- To: "Roland Orre" <orre@nada.kth.se>, "Gregory Aharonian" <srctran@world.std.com>
- Cc: "Patent forum" <patents@aful.org>, <epo@mlist.austria.eu.net>
- Subject: Re: [Patents] How to provide prior art info?
- Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 15:22:39 +0200
> As Greg mentioned for instance Star Trek, concerning my mistake about
> the MS application on an instant translator, how likely is it that the
> examiners will search through SF publications? (I know this happened
> for the communication satellite which was rejected because Arthur C
> Clarke had already published about it)
>
Many, many years ago, when I was a young examiner, a well-known mobile phone
company filed a patent application for a cellphone which could be folded in
half - the kind of design which is standard today. I cited a Star Trek
communicator. But the principal examiner didn't like the references to "beam
me up Scottie" and to an apparatus being "invented in about 400 years time".
> (I also have the feeling, that, certain examiners, due to a potential
> economical gain in granting a patent, despite how obvious it is, may
> not search very thoroughly...)
No. In my (admittedly ancient) experience there is considerable intellectual
satisfaction in finding relevant prior art.
Alec Clelland
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)