[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- To: Russell McOrmond <russell@flora.ca>
- Cc: Patent forum <patents@aful.org>
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Cryptographic patent... and research.
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:11:41 +0200 (CEST)
> - Patent office must actually achieve adequate levels of patent quality
> (I suggest 90-95% validity via the other 3 tests), for each subject matter
> to be considered statutory subject matter.
I find that a very good requirement.
The patent system as a whole should be challenged to reform within 3-5
years so as to ensure that the following 2 targets are achieved:
1. 90-95% of all patents granted are valid according to PTO criteria
2. 90-95% of all patents granted represent substantial investments
which are difficult to recoup without a 20 year monopoly.
If the patent system fails to achieve this target in a reasonable
timeframe, it should be abolished. In a time where workers are laid off
and pensions cut, we can not create a special zone of leniency for the
patent system. What doesn't perform must go away. The stringency of
reform must start from the rich, not from the poor.
- Re: [Patents] Cryptographic patent... and research., (continued)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)