[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- To: Gregory Aharonian <srctran@world.std.com>
- Cc: rms@gnu.org, <C-FIT_Community@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>, <C-FIT_Release_Community@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>, <fairuse-discuss@nyfairuse.org>, <DMCA_Discuss@lists.microshaft.org>, <DMCA-Activists@gnu.org>, <patents@aful.org>, <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Washington Times: Internet Patents Divide Industry
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:53:18 +0200 (CEST)
> > [the nature of the universe] is unrelated to the practical differences
> > between design of software and design of physical systems.
> Practical differences which in the world of hardware/software codesign,
> endless numbers of CAD/CAM/CAE etc. systems, differences that are going
> away. Computing is just another branch of physics and mathematics for
> which software and hardware is its engineereing arms. Software
> engineering often does not appear to be an engineering because so much
> of it is done so poorly.
Your cosmology is unrelated to the question of what co-design tools mean
for patentability.
As far as the old debate about co-design cosmology is concerned, you might
try Google with the search-word "co-design" and scope limitation to the
site "patents.aful.org/wws/arc/patents/". I'm sure you will find the same
argument about 20 times.
Or http://swpat.ffii.org/players/aharonian/. It would be great if someone
could use the time which a further flamewar could cause for creating some
nice text for that page.
--
Hartmut Pilch, FFII & Eurolinux Alliance tel. +49-89-18979927
Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
155,000 votes 2000 firms against software patents http://noepatents.org/
Re: [Patents] Washington Times: Internet Patents Divide Industry,
Richard Stallman
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)