[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
Cc: seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org, C-FIT_Community@RealMeasures.dyndns.org, C-FIT_Release_Community@RealMeasures.dyndns.org, fairuse-discuss@nyfairuse.org, DMCA_Discuss@lists.microshaft.org, DMCA-Activists@gnu.org, patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] Washington Times: Internet Patents Divide Industry
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:31:12 -0400

    > "Intellectual property" is not property.

    The term could be turned around to be useful.
    E.g. one could say that only an exclusion scope that it is so narrow that
    it is attributable to an individual is "intellectual property".

The term "intellectual property" encourages overgeneralization, which
leads people to choose between a few bad across-the-board alternatives.
There is no way to turn the term around to prevent that problem.
We have to attack it.

Re: [Patents] Washington Times: Internet Patents Divide Industry, (continued)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)