[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- To: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Washington Times: Internet Patents Divide Industry
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 19:39:28 +0200 (CEST)
> > > You own the patent not the idea. The problem is that immaterial property
> > > carry the idea that you own "the idea", not "an exclusive right on the
> > > idea".
> >
> > You own the right to exclude others from something, e.g. from the use of
> > an idea or the use of a piece of land.
>
> Note the difference between "exclusive right" meaning "the right to exclude"
> and "exclusive right" meaning a particular right "exclusively for the
> author."
I don't see a difference.
It can only be exclusively for the author if it includes a right for him
to enforce exclusion of others.
If there was a difference, that would mean that "exclusive right" is
an ambiguous word probably "exclusion right" is to be preferred.
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)