[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
- To: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- Cc: seth.johnson@realmeasures.dyndns.org, C-FIT_Community@realmeasures.dyndns.org, C-FIT_Release_Community@realmeasures.dyndns.org, fairuse-discuss@nyfairuse.org, DMCA_Discuss@lists.microshaft.org, DMCA-Activists@gnu.org, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Washington Times: Internet Patents Divide Industry
- Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 00:46:10 -0400
For this context, "immaterial property" seems just perfect to me (as would
the lengthier "exclusion right based assets"), whereas "exclusion rights"
still lacks meaning of "asset".
Our enemies want people to focus on the fact that these
are "economic assets" and ignore the fact that they are
restrictions on what other people can do.
To call them any sort of "property" is playing into
the hands of our enemies.
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)