[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>
- To: old.timer@tiscali.co.uk
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far'
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 15:00:52 +0200
- Organization: Xsec s.r.l.
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 14:53, old.timer@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
> The answers to Seth's questions are simple enough.
>
> 1) Because it (the EPO) is required to by the European Patent Convention
> and the WTO TRIPS agreement. And,
We need a PO Office, not necessarily the EPO :-)
> 2) Yes, software has always been patentable in Europe.
but the EPC claim that software as such is not patentable ... seem there
is a problem beetwen what the EPO grants and what the EPC state.
And I'm pretty sure software was not patentable before the '90s
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce@xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)