[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Philippe Coulonges <cphil@cphil.net>
- To: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far'
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:59:28 +0200
Le Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:54:09 +0200
Jean-Baptiste Soufron <jbsoufron@free.fr> écrivait :
> The problem is that lax in itself does mean NOTHING. Law has to be
> interpretated by judges and every interpretation is a new law in
> itself.
That's a specificity of anglo-saxon style law system I never understood.
Here (France) jurisprudence serves as a guideline, but doesn't make law.
Does someone knows how it stands for european laws ?
CU
CPHIL
--
Man usually avoids attributing cleverness to somebody else, unless it
is an enemy.
-- Albert Einstein
- Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', (continued)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)