[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Jean-Baptiste Soufron <jbsoufron@free.fr>
To: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far'
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:39:55 +0200

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:58:24 -0400
"Seth Johnson" <seth.johnson@realmeasures.dyndns.org> wrote:

> I know it's hard for you to accept.

The problem is that nobody will ever exactly agree on the meaning of the
terms contained in the text.

Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', (continued)
- Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', Seth Johnson
- Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', Seth Johnson
  - Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', Jean-Baptiste Soufron
    - Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', Seth Johnson
      - Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', Russell McOrmond
        
        Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', Hartmut Pilch
  - Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', Jean-Michel POURE

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)