[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Bernard Lang <Bernard.Lang@inria.fr>
- To: old.timer@tiscali.co.uk, James Heald <j.heald@ucl.ac.uk>, Russell McOrmond <russell@flora.ca>
- Cc: Patent forum <patents@aful.org>
- Subject: Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far'
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:25:34 +0200
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 11:46:47AM +0100, old.timer@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
> But patents are supposed to be about protecting concepts, regardless
> of any specific implementation. If the underlying idea is a
> patentable invention, why should others be able to steal that
> invention if they use a computer program, but not if they use any
> other means?
because innovation is not naturally the property of anyone.
- it can be discovered by many people independently ... hence no one
is stealing
- it can be invented by 2 people about the same time (there are even
riules to determine who then gets the patents, that are different in
the US and in Europe)
- it can be attributed as a temporary property, through the patent
system, if doing so is useful to society.
but it is not a natural right
An patents were never intended to protect concepts or ideas.
But of course, Mr Anonymous Coward <old.timer@tiscali.co.uk> wrote
this only to waste our time and confuse the issues.
just in case you did not notice the nature of his contributions.
Bernard
> >-- Original Message --
> >James Heald wrote:
>
> I would like to second this.
>
> The proposed EU parliament test for "technical" would allow an new algorithm
> for FGPA layout to be patentable if it had a physical effect -- perhaps
> a new way to reduce capacitative coupling for example.
>
> But the program itself laid out on the FGPA should not be patentable. The
> specific implementation should be defended by copyright. But there is no
> economic case for allowing the sequence of the abstract data processing
> to be monopolised by patent.
>
> All best,
>
> James.
>
--
Non aux Brevets Logiciels - No to Software Patents
SIGNEZ http://petition.eurolinux.org/ SIGN
Bernard.Lang@inria.fr ,_ /\o \o/ Tel +33 1 3963 5644
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~lang/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Fax +33 1 3963 5469
INRIA / B.P. 105 / 78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX / France
Je n'exprime que mon opinion - I express only my opinion
CAGED BEHIND WINDOWS or FREE WITH LINUX
Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far',
Rui Miguel Seabra
Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far',
Stefano Maffulli
Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far',
Russell McOrmond
Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', Bernard Lang
Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far',
Jean-Baptiste Soufron
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)