[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: alexandre priou <mailing@sigl3d.org>
To: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far'
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:45:58 +0200
Posted-date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:44:57 -0200

Bernard Lang wrote:

On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 07:25:56PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Soufron wrote:

You would the beneficiary of the opposite system, does it make you
unable to decide what's good or wrong?



silly   ... they pretend patents are for our own good.

   we are supposed to be the beneficiaries.

but we all know the money goes to lawyers.


And I stand buy my statement :  jurists are becoming a social cancer.

 which does not mean in any way that they are all bad guys.

 Cancer: useless cells that reproduce and proliferate uncontrollably,
diverting the resources of the living body and perturbing its natural
functions.

Everybody benefits from something, this argument is a complete troll.

The only point to look at, from a legal point of view, is to know if
software patents are fair or not and to explain why. 
To my mind they are clearly unfair.

Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', (continued)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)